Skip to contentLenax

Employer and employee OHS duties - what the Polish Labour Code says

A practical guide to the OHS duties of employers, managers and employees under the Polish Labour Code - art. 207-212, refusal of unsafe work and 2026 fines.

Author: Lenax - Centrum Szkoleniowo-Doradcze
  • employer OHS duties
  • employee OHS obligations
  • OHS regulations
  • labour inspection
  • szkolenia BHP

Polish law divides OHS tasks between the employer, people directing employees and employees themselves. Assigning those tasks clearly helps the company meet its obligations, but does not transfer the employer’s statutory responsibility for working conditions. This guide distinguishes each role’s duties and the conditions for stopping unsafe work.

Accountability and duties - not the same thing

It is worth separating two concepts that are frequently confused in practice. Responsibility for the state of occupational health and safety in the entire establishment rests with the employer - regardless of how many people they employ, whether they use an external OHS service, or how the people under them behave (art. 207(1) of the Labour Code). Duties, however, belong to every participant in the work process: the employer organises the conditions, the manager enforces them at the workstations, and the employees follow them day to day. We discuss why this responsibility cannot be shifted onto anyone else in a separate article on who is responsible for health and safety in a company. Here we focus on the catalogue of duties - that is, on what each of these people must actually do, because it is precisely these catalogues that the labour inspectorate relies on during an inspection.

Employer duties - the catalogue in art. 207 of the Labour Code

Art. 207(2) of the Labour Code (consolidated text, Journal of Laws Dz.U. 2026 poz. 1245) turns the general principle of protecting employees' health and life into seven concrete tasks. The employer must organise work so that conditions are safe and hygienic, and ensure compliance with OHS provisions and rules in the establishment - which includes issuing orders to remove shortcomings and verifying that they have been carried out, not merely issuing the order. The employer must respond to OHS needs and improve the existing level of protection whenever working conditions change, and develop a coherent prevention policy covering accidents and occupational diseases, taking into account technology, work organisation and social relations. The catalogue closes with three duties that are easy to forget: taking into account in preventive activities the protection of young workers, pregnant or breastfeeding employees and employees with disabilities, executing orders and decisions of labour supervision bodies, and implementing the recommendations of the social labour inspector.

To this come the information and training duties. Art. 207¹ of the Labour Code requires the employer to inform employees about the hazards present at their workstations, about the protective measures already taken, and about the persons designated to provide first aid and conduct evacuations - including those persons' names, workplace and telephone number or another electronic means of communication. Art. 94(4) of the Labour Code, in turn, requires systematic training of employees in OHS - with periodic training where required; see our OHS training offer. The catalogue is completed by a financial rule: the costs of OHS measures may not burden employees "in any way" (art. 207 § 2¹ of the Labour Code) - this covers protective equipment as well as medical examinations and training.

Duties of the person directing employees - art. 212 of the Labour Code

A supervisor, foreman or crew leader has their own catalogue of tasks in art. 212 of the Labour Code. They organise workstations in accordance with OHS provisions and prepare and conduct work with a view to protecting people against accidents and occupational diseases. They see to the efficiency of personal protective equipment and to its correct use, as well as to the safe condition of premises and technical equipment and the efficiency of collective protection measures. They also enforce compliance with the rules by the employees under them and ensure that the recommendations of the doctor providing healthcare to the workforce are carried out. Together with the employer, the person directing employees must also know the labour protection provisions to the extent necessary to perform their duties (art. 207(3) of the Labour Code) - which is why this group has its own, longer periodic training.

Employee OHS duties - art. 211 of the Labour Code

Art. 211 of the Labour Code names compliance with OHS provisions and rules as the employee's basic duty and develops it into seven tasks. The employee must know the safety provisions and rules, take part in training and instruction, and undergo the required examinations. They must perform work in accordance with the provisions and follow the instructions of their superiors in this respect, care for the efficiency of machines and tools and for order at the workstation, use collective protection measures, and use the assigned personal protective equipment and work clothing as intended. They must undergo initial, periodic and follow-up medical examinations, immediately notify their superior of any accident or threat to life and health they notice, warn fellow workers, and cooperate with the employer in fulfilling his OHS duties. The same obligation is repeated in the catalogue of basic employee duties in art. 100(2)(3) of the Labour Code, which covers compliance with OHS and fire protection provisions.

The right to refuse work - art. 210 of the Labour Code

Under art. 210 §§ 1–2, an employee may refrain from work where conditions breach OHS provisions and create a direct danger to their life or health, or the work creates such danger for others, immediately notifying the supervisor. If stopping work does not remove the danger, they may leave the danger area and must notify the supervisor. For those cases, §§ 2¹–3 protect against adverse consequences and preserve pay. A different rule in § 4 concerns listed work requiring particular psychophysical fitness: if the employee’s condition prevents safe performance and endangers others, they may refrain after notifying the supervisor in advance. That provision does not itself preserve pay. Under § 5, §§ 1, 2 and 4 do not apply to employees whose duty is to save life or property.

The protection also works in the other direction - in favour of an employee who reacts to danger themselves. Art. 209³ of the Labour Code obliges the employer to enable the employee to take action to avoid danger even without agreement with the superior, to the extent of the employee's knowledge and the available technical means, while art. 209² requires the employer, in the event of a direct threat, to halt work and not order its resumption until the danger has been removed. The catalogue is therefore two-directional: the employee has the right to stop working in the face of danger, and the employer must enable this and remove the danger itself.

How to meet OHS duties in practice

The catalogues from chapters I and II of part X of the Labour Code are easy to turn into an annual routine that can be documented before an inspection:

  1. Put the duties in writing - who in the company organises workstations, who enforces the rules, who designates the persons responsible for first aid and evacuation (art. 207¹ and art. 212 of the Labour Code).
  2. Show employees the hazards at their workstations ; recording delivery is a useful evidentiary measure, not a separate written-confirmation requirement in that article (art. 207¹ of the Labour Code).
  3. Plan training and medical examinations for the whole year - systematic training is required by art. 94(4) of the Labour Code; see our OHS training offer.
  4. Issue orders to remove shortcomings and document their execution - a record of an order without checking its completion is not enough (art. 207(2)(2) of the Labour Code).
  5. Agree with employees on how to report hazards and defects - so that the right to refuse work under art. 210 does not remain a theoretical provision.
  6. Do not pass costs on to employees - no "contributions towards helmets" and no deductions for protective equipment (art. 207 § 2¹ of the Labour Code).

Penalties for neglecting OHS duties

Failure to comply with OHS provisions or rules by the person responsible for their state, or by a person directing employees, carries a fine of PLN 2,000 to PLN 60,000 (art. 283(1) of the Labour Code; the amounts apply from 8 July 2026 under the amendment published in Dz.U. 2026 poz. 473). The same penalty applies to a manager who, despite the duties under art. 212, tolerates shortcomings. A rank-and-file employee is not subject to the fine under art. 283 of the Labour Code - their violations are dealt with by the employer under the disciplinary procedure, including disciplinary penalties under art. 108 of the Labour Code. A full overview of the rates and types of liability can be found in our article on OHS fines 2026.

Summary

  • Responsibility for the state of OHS in the entire establishment rests with the employer (art. 207(1) of the Labour Code), but duties exist at every level: the employer organises and provides (art. 207(2)), the manager prepares the work and enforces the rules (art. 212), and the employee follows the provisions, uses protective equipment and reports hazards (art. 211).
  • The law gives the employee a shield: in the face of a direct threat they may refrain from work or leave, retaining the right to pay and without negative consequences (art. 210 of the Labour Code), while the employer must halt the work and remove the danger (art. 209² of the Labour Code).
  • Neglecting OHS duties now costs a fine of PLN 2,000 to PLN 60,000 (art. 283(1) of the Labour Code, from 8 July 2026), and the best defence is duties put in writing, documented and embedded in an annual rhythm of training and checks.

If you want your company's OHS duties written down and documented without building your own procedures from scratch, see our OHS outsourcing services or contact us - we will help you put the duties in order before a labour inspector does it for you.

FAQ

Can an employee refuse to perform dangerous work? Yes. Where working conditions pose a direct threat to health or life, the employee refrains from work while notifying the superior, and if this does not remove the danger - may leave the place of danger (art. 210 of the Labour Code). They retain the right to pay and may not suffer any negative consequences. The exception covers persons whose duty is to save human life or property.

Who is responsible for OHS if the employee violates the rules themselves? Responsibility for the state of OHS in the establishment always rests with the employer - its scope is not affected by employee duties or by entrusting OHS tasks to external specialists (art. 207(1) of the Labour Code). An employee who violates the rules is, however, answerable to the employer under the disciplinary procedure, in extreme cases with a disciplinary penalty under art. 108 of the Labour Code.

Can the employer charge employees for protective equipment or OHS training? No. Art. 207 § 2¹ of the Labour Code provides that the costs of measures taken by the employer in the field of OHS may not burden employees in any way - this covers personal protective equipment, medical examinations and training.

What duties does a manager or foreman have in the field of OHS? Art. 212 of the Labour Code obliges the person directing employees to organise workstations in accordance with the provisions, to see to the efficiency and correct use of protective equipment, to protect employees against accidents and occupational diseases, to enforce compliance with the rules, and to ensure that the doctor's recommendations are carried out. The manager must also know the OHS provisions to the extent necessary to perform their duties (art. 207(3) of the Labour Code).

What is the penalty in 2026 for failure to comply with OHS duties? A fine of PLN 2,000 to PLN 60,000 for the person responsible for the state of OHS or directing employees (art. 283(1) of the Labour Code, after the amendment in force from 8 July 2026). Criminal liability under art. 220 of the Criminal Code requires a person responsible for OHS to breach their duty and thereby expose an employee to immediate danger of death or severe injury, with the applicable fault requirements; it does not follow automatically from the occurrence of danger.

Does a one-off initial training satisfy the employer's training duties? Not generally. Periodic training is required for the groups specified in the training regulation, at intervals depending on the work. However, art. 237³ §§ 2²–2⁴ provides an exemption for qualifying administrative-office workers in activity groups of risk category no higher than three, unless the risk assessment requires training. Regular remote work excludes that exemption; occasional remote work does not automatically exclude it.

Sources

Legal status checked: 15 October 2026. This article is for information only and does not constitute legal advice. For individual cases consult a lawyer or an OHS specialist.

Related articles

Contact

Let’s find the right course for you.

Tell us what you need. We’ll help you choose training or arrange safety support for your business.

Office

ul. Mikołowska 7
44-100 Gliwice
Get directions

Opening hours

Monday–Friday, 8:00–16:00